Select your language

The European Union is preparing a package of measures that could have a notable impact on the food industry and distribution chains. Among them is the introduction of a specific tax on ultra-processed foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS), as well as on certain alcoholic beverages, including alcopops. The stated goal is to discourage the consumption of products considered harmful to cardiovascular health and promote healthier eating habits. For producers, distributors and food & beverage brands, this policy may also lead to changes in product formulation, positioning and commercialization strategies.

A new scenario for the food industry

For companies involved in the agri-food sector, food processing and distribution, the prospect of an EU-level tax on specific food categories is a signal that must be taken seriously. Beyond health objectives, it represents a call to rethink business models, ingredients, processes and communication. In the European market - where nutritional quality, labeling and transparency carry increasing weight - the combination of fiscal policy and public health may create both challenges and opportunities.

On one hand, products falling into high-risk categories (ultra-processed snacks, beverages, and highly processed ready-to-eat foods) could face additional costs or declining demand. On the other hand, companies already anticipating healthier, clean-label or more natural formulations may be rewarded by a regulatory environment that favors them. A strategic reassessment is therefore needed: ingredients, production processes, labeling, packaging and marketing must all be evaluated in light of a changing context.

In this environment, companies must focus not only on the product itself but also on how it is communicated, positioned and distributed - following emerging trends such as the demand for less processed foods. Adopting more flexible production models that can quickly adapt to evolving regulations, market shifts and a much more dynamic environment, developing products with improved nutritional profiles, and reviewing distribution chains with regard to potential additional costs or new tax rates all become central priorities.

EU measures under consideration

The European Commission's draft plan for cardiovascular health outlines several actions with direct implications for the food industry, within a broader framework that includes lifestyle interventions, early diagnosis and healthcare systems. In particular:

  • A EU-wide tax on ultra-processed foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS), as well as certain alcoholic beverages - including alcopops - is expected by 2026.

  • Targets for 2035 include a 20% reduction in cardiovascular mortality and achieving diagnosis and control rates of 70% for hypertension and 80% for diabetes/obesity. The plan is built around three pillars: prevention, early diagnosis and monitoring, and treatment and care.

  • The Commission plans to use digital technologies and artificial intelligence to assess levels of food processing and related health risks. It also aims to establish an integrated system to monitor and classify processing levels.

  • Regulatory efforts will also be strengthened through the program "The EU Cares for Your Heart", promoting national plans by 2027 and supporting cooperation among Member States on the taxation of high-risk food products.

  • EU harmonization will help standardize HFSS taxation, which is currently left to national initiatives. Twelve Member States have already implemented specific measures - mostly taxes on sugary drinks - creating a fragmented landscape the Commission aims to make more consistent.

  • The purpose of the tax is not to increase revenue, but to promote healthier dietary choices. According to the study "Health taxes from an EU perspective" (DG TAXUD, European Commission), the impact may be greatest among lower-income groups, who tend to consume HFSS products more frequently and, on average, face higher cardiovascular risks.

In summary, the EU aims to use fiscal tools that directly influence the competitive environment of the food industry - discouraging consumption of certain products and encouraging reformulation aligned with health recommendations.

Uncertainties: what will be taxed and what won't?

Despite initial indications from the cardiovascular health plan, many details remain unclear, especially regarding the technical criteria that will determine which products fall under the tax. More detailed documents - particularly the European Commission's official legislative proposal and accompanying technical guidelines - will be required to establish specific thresholds for sugar, saturated fat, salt and processing levels.

Until then, only general assessments can be made. Based on the experience of EU countries that already apply HFSS taxes, it is likely that measures will focus on sugary drinks, industrial snacks and widely consumed ultra-processed foods. It is unlikely that traditional products such as PDO cured meats or regional specialties high in fat or salt will be included, as they fall outside the definition of ultra-processed foods.

Process and timeline

The European Commission is expected to present its new cardiovascular health plan by December 2025. While initial indications suggest that fiscal measures could begin by 2026, it is unlikely that an EU-wide harmonized tax will be fully implemented before the end of next year. The proposal must first be submitted by the Commission and then approved by Member States, which must reach unanimity on tax matters - a process that is typically long and complex. As a result, 2026 is more likely to represent the start of the legislative process rather than its effective implementation.

As for the likelihood of rapid adoption, official sources highlight strong political commitment from the Commission, especially regarding HFSS food and beverage taxation. However, several institutional barriers remain. Taxation is a sensitive area of national sovereignty, and adopting a unified tax requires complex procedures (broad initial consensus on key points and unanimity for final approval).

In short, the process may involve consultations and adjustments, extending timelines and potentially narrowing the scope compared to the initial proposal.

Impacts and strategies for the food sector

Given this potential regulatory shift, food companies must prepare carefully. Criteria such as fat, sugar and salt levels or the degree of processing will not only influence the nutritional profile of products - they may also determine whether they fall into categories subject to taxation or corrective actions.

It is equally important to consider how products will be perceived in a changing regulatory landscape. When a product is taxed to discourage consumption and reduce health risks, this inevitably reinforces public perceptions that certain formulations should be limited or avoided. What today is a technical or nutritional attribute may tomorrow influence price, competitiveness and market reputation.

An effective strategy begins with reviewing the product portfolio: identifying items potentially exposed to future taxation or penalties, analyzing margins and demand, and assessing reformulation options. This includes reviewing ingredients, reducing critical components (sugars, salt, saturated fats) and adopting packaging and communication choices that emphasize transparency and quality.

Another decisive lever is marketing and communication. As consumers and distributors become increasingly attentive to nutritional and regulatory aspects, demand for more natural, less processed and low-HFSS products is expected to continue rising.

From a distribution and channel perspective, companies must assess how taxation may affect final pricing, margins and channel selection (traditional retail, e-commerce, import-export, specialty channels). Distributors will face a scenario where the cost of certain products may increase and where demand may shift toward healthier alternatives.

Finally, compliance and regulatory governance become essential: monitoring EU developments, participating in consultations, working with industry associations and preparing internal audit systems to assess potential impacts on products and processes.

Opportunities to leverage

Despite the challenges, there are concrete opportunities. The EU's focus on cardiovascular health and "non–ultra-processed" products can create competitive advantages for companies investing in innovation, quality and differentiation. Products with premium ingredients, transparent supply chains, well-substantiated health claims and packaging that clearly communicates value may benefit in a market increasingly oriented toward healthier diets.

Anticipating regulatory changes can also become a strategic communication asset: highlighting compliance with health recommendations - at the core of public health initiatives and prevention guidelines - can help differentiate products and strengthen market positioning.